Print Post Print Post

Why Medicare And Social Security ARE Welfare Programs

Quite frequently, when this topic comes up, many Americans, rightly, will say, “we paid into these programs, and we are entitled to the benefits.” I totally agree with that sentiment. Millions of Americans, over several decades, have paid into these programs, which I, often, refer to as Debticare, and Social Insecurity; I refer to them as such, because, anyone who is even minimally engaged in politics, these days, understands that both of these programs are bankrupt, and unfunded to the tune of trillions (with a T) of dollars. And, while people did pay into them, and they are entitled to the benefits, it does not excuse away the fact that these programs have become an enormous burden to the tax payers, and, will eventually bankrupt our Federal Government. Serious reforms need to be put in place, which should involve free-market forces, and the ability for Americans to opt/out of these programs, so that they can use that money to manage their own healthcare and retirement accounts.

Putting aside the obvious economic problems with these two BIG GOVERNMENT programs, there are, however, huge moral questions, as well, tied to them. For example, if one refers to these so-called entitlement programs as welfare, many people get up in arms, due to the aforementioned reason, that, over several decades, Americans have paid into these programs; and, today, when one thinks of the word welfare, they tend to think of it as “free” tax payer money that is given to people who have not paid into a program, or people “who choose not to work,” but collect Government benefits, at the expense of the tax payer.


Welfare:
1. The good fortune, health, happiness, prosperity, etc., of a person, group, or organization; well-being: to look after a child’s welfare; the physical or moral welfare of society.


Traditionally, the word Welfare, as in The General Welfare Clause, in Article 1, Section 8, of The United States Constitution, was understood to be similar to the above definition. For example, our military was created to look after the welfare of our country, should we be invaded by a foreign aggressor. Congress was empowered by our Founders to create laws governing Patents and Copyrights, so that inventors, artists etc, could create products, works of art etc, and have such creations and inventions protected by Law. Congress was also given the Power to create Laws governing bankruptcy – should a business or family get overextended, and unable to pay their debts, an independent court could help them to discharge that debt, and begin anew. Congress was instructed to create a sound currency system, and facilitate free trade among the several states. These are but a few examples of what was meant by Welfare in the days of our Founders, and for many years thereafter.

When it comes to Government, most citizens, I believe, would “consent” to the fact that Government does have core duties that are geared toward the Public’s General Welfare – such as having a court system; adjudicating contracts; a reasonable police force; a fire department etc. But, when The General Welfare of citizens extends to a person’s financial well-being, their healthcare etc, this is the realm in which the contention begins.

While, for most seniors, Government did not provide the money for their Social Security and Medicare, such programs do put the citizen’s “well-being,” squarely, in the hands of The Government. The U.S. Government, under these programs, can decide how much money a senior can receive each month; and what age they need to be, in order to just begin receiving “their money.” They can decide what medical care, and medications, a senior can have access to; and, how much of the respective services will be paid for. And, so on.

When we, as citizens, give our Government, whether it is State of Federal, such Power over the most intimate decisions of our lives, the fact that we paid for such services does not diminish the fact that our [welfare] well-being lies, “squarely,” in the hands of Government.


Further Viewing:
Why Social Security Is Worse Than A Ponzi Scheme


Posted, also, at Conservative Daily News




Like/Follow The Original Republican


If you enjoyed this post, simply enter your email address below,
to receive new posts by email:


Delivered by FeedBurner

Comment Feed
  1. I see the word “health” in the definition of welfare. If I were to play devils advocate I would say, “see, the word health defines welfare. This means the federal government should make sure we have good healthcare.” I realize though that it is not enumerated specifically in the Constitution. Welfare means to the extent enumerated in the Constitution.

  2. Exactly right Thomas! [General] Welfare means “to the extent enumerated in the Constitution.”

    It is a parent’s job to provide for their child’s [welfare] “health,” and to make sure that their children have decent healthcare. It is Congress’ job to facilitate free trade among the States; which, if they applied that principle to healthcare, rather then creating these Government monopolies, we would have “access to free-market, affordable healthcare.”

  3. You are really ridiculous to say that social security is welfare, people pay into SS all their lives through their paychecks and deductions. This is no different than those ira’s or 401k plans that you pay into and get it at retirement. Only a republican hatemonger like you is blind enough to not see things for what they really are. I bet you probably take advantage of some of the programs that the government supports and have taken the student pell grants which is free money to students.

  4. “…people pay into SS all their lives through their paychecks and deductions.”

    I’ve acknowledged that in the post, and appreciate that.

    “This is no different than those ira’s or 401k plans that you pay into and get it at retirement.”

    It is vastly different! 401Ks and IRAs are voluntary contributions to one’s retirement accounts. And, even more importantly, it doesn’t put a bunch of politicians in charge of one’s money – nor do they have access to it.

    “Only a republican hatemonger like you…”

    I’m not a Republican, nor is the word “hate” in my vocabulary.

    “…and have taken the student pell grants which is free money to students.”

    And, that line, shows the general economic ignorance of so many people on the left. Government does not create wealth – they can only tax away other people’s wealth. Therefore, nothing is free if one is paying taxes.

    The irony here is, if you ask a leftie where The Federal Government gets the Power to be involved in such things, they point to the General “Welfare” Clause.

    I stand my last paragraph:

    “When we, as citizens, give our Government, whether it is State of Federal, such Power over the most intimate decisions of our lives, the fact that we paid for such services does not diminish the fact that our [welfare] well-being lies, “squarely,” in the hands of Government.”

    If you’re too blind to see that, then, there isn’t much else I can say.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>